Test Item Writing - ESAP 2017

Test Item Writing - ESAP 2016

Thank you for your contributions to ESAP 2016!

In recognition of the learning that occurs as a part of your authoring process, we are happy to offer CME credit for your work. The Endocrine Society, which is accredited by the Accreditation Council on Continuing Medical Education (ACCME) to provide continuing medical education for physicians, designates this test item writing activity for a maximum of 10 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™.

Please complete a short online evaluation, which will provide you with a chance to reflect on your authoring experience and also help us ensure that this educational activity continues to meet your learning needs. Please click here to complete the survey, which should take you 3 minutes to complete, and claim your CME.

If you have any questions, please contact Kristen Flemming, Manager, Self-Assessment and CME Publications, at kflemming@endocrine.org.

Participating in this CME activity has improved my ability to: *

	Yes	No	NA
My knowledge in the field of endocrine physiology and pathophysiology.	My knowledge in the field of endocrine physiology and pathophysiology. - Yes	My knowledge in the field of endocrine physiology and pathophysiology. - No	My knowledge in the field of endocrine physiology and pathophysiology. - NA
My skills in identifying the strengths and weaknesses of scientific test items.	My skills in identifying the strengths and weaknesses of scientific test items. - Yes	My skills in identifying the strengths and weaknesses of scientific test items. - No	My skills in identifying the strengths and weaknesses of scientific test items. - NA
My communication about content and to provide rationale for drafted cases during the peer-review process.	My communication about content and to provide rationale for drafted cases during the peer-review process. - Yes	My communication about content and to provide rationale for drafted cases during the peer-review process. - No	My communication about content and to provide rationale for drafted cases during the peer-review process. - NA
My ability to integrate peer-review feedback into question writing.	My ability to integrate peer-review feedback into question writing. - Yes	My ability to integrate peer-review feedback into question writing. - No	My ability to integrate peer-review feedback into question writing. - NA
My ability to provide clear and concise learning objectives linked to a curriculum/content blueprint appropriate for the activity’s audience of learners.	My ability to provide clear and concise learning objectives linked to a curriculum/content blueprint appropriate for the activity’s audience of learners. - Yes	My ability to provide clear and concise learning objectives linked to a curriculum/content blueprint appropriate for the activity’s audience of learners. - No	My ability to provide clear and concise learning objectives linked to a curriculum/content blueprint appropriate for the activity’s audience of learners. - NA
My ability to select appropriate literature support for peers and learners to reinforce educational value through subsequent self-directed learning.	My ability to select appropriate literature support for peers and learners to reinforce educational value through subsequent self-directed learning. - Yes	My ability to select appropriate literature support for peers and learners to reinforce educational value through subsequent self-directed learning. - No	My ability to select appropriate literature support for peers and learners to reinforce educational value through subsequent self-directed learning. - NA

Do you believe your participation in this activity has: *

	Definitely	Very Likely	Possibly	Unlikely	Not at all	NA
Expanded your medical knowledge and/or enhanced clinical practice skills.	Expanded your medical knowledge and/or enhanced clinical practice skills. - Definitely	Expanded your medical knowledge and/or enhanced clinical practice skills. - Very Likely	Expanded your medical knowledge and/or enhanced clinical practice skills. - Possibly	Expanded your medical knowledge and/or enhanced clinical practice skills. - Unlikely	Expanded your medical knowledge and/or enhanced clinical practice skills. - Not at all	Expanded your medical knowledge and/or enhanced clinical practice skills. - NA
Will affect patient outcomes in my practice.	Will affect patient outcomes in my practice. - Definitely	Will affect patient outcomes in my practice. - Very Likely	Will affect patient outcomes in my practice. - Possibly	Will affect patient outcomes in my practice. - Unlikely	Will affect patient outcomes in my practice. - Not at all	Will affect patient outcomes in my practice. - NA
Was relevant to my clinical practice.	Was relevant to my clinical practice. - Definitely	Was relevant to my clinical practice. - Very Likely	Was relevant to my clinical practice. - Possibly	Was relevant to my clinical practice. - Unlikely	Was relevant to my clinical practice. - Not at all	Was relevant to my clinical practice. - NA

In general, how much time did you spend developing and refining one question (research through final editing) for this product? *

More than 6 hours

4-6 hours

2-3 hours

less than 1 hour

Please provide an estimate of the percentage of your questions derived from your actual clinical experience: *

What strategies for effective peer-review did you use or see during the peer-review meeting for the development of ESAP content? *

Please share your suggestions for how we can improve your authoring and the peer-review process: *

Leave this field blank

the Endocrine Society Center for Learning

Hormone Science to Health

Test Item Writing - ESAP 2017

Test Item Writing - ESAP 2016

Test Item Writing Evaluation

Course navigation

You are here

Test Item Writing - ESAP 2017

Test Item Writing - ESAP 2016

Test Item Writing Evaluation

Course navigation